
Writing
Stampede at the Gates
AI generation exposed an already flawed SDLC: faster code review moves the queue to verification, which needs functional acceptance testing at the boundary.

Topic
Turning written guidance into rules a reviewer can apply consistently, by machine or by hand.
5 pages

Writing
AI generation exposed an already flawed SDLC: faster code review moves the queue to verification, which needs functional acceptance testing at the boundary.

Writing
Stakes and human verification determine where workflow control belongs. Explicit prompts guide a model; imperative code enforces steps, checks, and use of results.

Writing
A growing acceptance suite stays trustworthy through explicit scenarios and owned resources. Organize by feature, keep Act visible, review complete comparisons, and retain useful CI failures.

Writing
A green suite needs correct scenarios for established requirements. An obligation map connects each rule to its arrangement, expected outcome, independent observation, and assertion.

Writing
Engineering both gates requires certified code review, functional acceptance tests at the boundary ratified by humans, and verification against the specification.